From: Naron (naron_at_bigpond.net.au)
Date: Sun Oct 19 2003 - 00:00:32 BST
Hi John,
I have no problems with you being on the list. I value your opinion as much
as anyones, if not more. I am always careful not to reveal too much about
what is going on as I know there are a few of my players on those lists!
I am sadly not on the playtesting list, which is probably appropriate
because I have no in person games running due to lack of players in the
place I live. Cant really test a game properly if I cant sit down with a
bunch of guys. The system does seem to work well for PBeM though. There
are few systems well suited to the style of play.
Anyhow, better get this post done!
Cheers
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Constable" <john_at_kript.net>
To: "Naron" <naron_at_bigpond.net.au>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: Earthdawn PBeM BN 5.6 Into the darkness....
>
> On Saturday, October 18, 2003, at 03:06 pm, Naron wrote:
>
> > It does not look as though Pain will affect a creature as the target
> > specifies a character which I will take to mean another Name Giver. I
> > have
> > looked across several spells and it seems that this is the standard
> > that
> > applies. In spells that can affect creatures as well, they generally
> > use
> > the terminology of just target or victim. In spells that seem to
> > affect
> > name-givers it talks of characters.
> >
> > So, in other words, I will put spirit double in for you.
> >
> >
> Cool, thanks. I had come to a similar conclusion, reading through my
> 2nd ed rulebook.
> Yes, I finally went and bought one.....the day RedBrick make their
> announcement.. :-)
> (nice post, BTW)!
>
> Hope you didn't mind me putting in my two penny's worth on the
> beastmaster stuff. If you'd rather I didn't comment on something that
> might affect us in-game, let me know. In fact, since this game is my
> only ED one at the moment, if you were rather I wasn't *on* the list,
> so you can discuss stuff, thats cool too.
>
> BTW, before I forget. Are you on the playtest group for LRG? If not,
> I raised a Knack covering the multi-domination issue for the 2nd Makers
> of Legend book, inspired by the discussions. More I probably can't say
> unless you're on it.. :-)
>
> cheers!
>
> John
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Mon Oct 27 2003 - 12:18:10 GMT