From: Darswinkle (Darswinkle_at_Darswinkles-Delights.com)
Date: Mon Jan 19 2004 - 20:31:31 GMT
Having the document that you have written put on the website is a good idea. I have looked thru it and you do good work.
The posts on the list might not be in chronological order but you document is. That way people can read it and get a better heads up on what is going on.
DaNel Resha
Darswinkle's Delights
P. O. Box 103
Smyrna, TN 37167
615-355-5533
www.darswinkles-Delights.com for all your gift giving needs
www.my.tupperware.com/Darswinkle for all your Tupperware needs
Ask me about Conklin products for your home and pets
http://www.delightfulgourmetwonders.com/DarswinkleGoodies/ is the place to go to fill that sweet tooth
----- Original Message -----
From: Jhez Salin
To: 'parlainth_at_teaparty.net'
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 10:02 PM
Subject: RE: [ooc] RE: A theoretical magical discussion
Ok, I don't find it nearly as cumbersome as you do, so I'll renew my offer.
I am making a compilation of the mails sent to the list, ordered by logic
and what is replied to. The compilation is in Word, so far a document for
each chapter. I would not mind sending that document to you once a week so
you can add it to the website for everybodys enjoyment. It should sort out
your problem I think.
Jhez
On 19. januar 2004 06:19, David Dankel [SMTP:stgdankel_at_gmx.net] wrote:
> > OOC: :-) its here now! BTW I'm sending this, both in a way similar to
> > what Daniel described (I hope :-), and also as a prequel to Illyana's
> > response. While this will bifurcate (word of the day!) the discussion,
> > it should do so in a linear fashion, allowing us to continue the two
> > conversations independent of one another.
>
> Yeah, I wasn't as clear as I wanted - using the Dankel-method (yeah, I'm
> that conceited ;) ), you would have taken Illyana's last reply and put
your
> stuff in the appropriate place instead of using T'sunami's, or at the
> instead pasted Illyana's reply below what you did in yours (since
> chronologicaly it would appear you spoke before her). I did something
> similar in my IC post sent with this one, if an example's needed. :)
>
> Splitting the converstaion into two simultaeous threads is just IMO what
> shouldn't be done, but that's just my opinion. Though if it works for
> everyone else, then that's fine by me.
>
> > What I've done, though, is
> > change the subject line. In other lists, I find changing the subject
> > very helpful, to allow the eye to quickly see ongoing "conversations",
> > so I'd propose doing that as well in future, That way, it helps delimit
> > the mails as to what conversation is in what - the only thing we have
> > to do then is keep them relevent, and a good way of doing this is
> > starting a new thread, or conversation, when you want to discuss, or
> > split up the topic.
>
> Actually Doug specifically requested we not change subjects so he can
sort
> mail by subject and have it chronological and what-not. Or, I assume, at
> least keep the chapter designation up there. Not sure about that last
part,
> though - I figure Doug will correct me when he gets back. :)
>
>
> -> Mailing List Archive - http://www.kript.net/parlainth/
> -> To unsubscribe: send a mail to majordomo_at_teaparty.net
> with the body text "unsubscribe parlainth"
> -> To see who's on the list: send a mail to majordomo_at_teaparty.net
> with the body text "who parlainth"
-> Mailing List Archive - http://www.kript.net/parlainth/
-> To unsubscribe: send a mail to majordomo_at_teaparty.net
with the body text "unsubscribe parlainth"
-> To see who's on the list: send a mail to majordomo_at_teaparty.net
with the body text "who parlainth"
-> Mailing List Archive - http://www.kript.net/parlainth/
-> To unsubscribe: send a mail to majordomo_at_teaparty.net
with the body text "unsubscribe parlainth"
-> To see who's on the list: send a mail to majordomo_at_teaparty.net
with the body text "who parlainth"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Mon Jan 19 2004 - 18:26:34 GMT