From: Jhez Salin (Jhez_at_wanadoo.dk)
Date: Mon Jan 19 2004 - 06:02:00 GMT
Ok, I don't find it nearly as cumbersome as you do, so I'll renew my offer.
I am making a compilation of the mails sent to the list, ordered by logic
and what is replied to. The compilation is in Word, so far a document for
each chapter. I would not mind sending that document to you once a week so
you can add it to the website for everybodys enjoyment. It should sort out
your problem I think.
Jhez
On 19. januar 2004 06:19, David Dankel [SMTP:stgdankel_at_gmx.net] wrote:
> > OOC: :-) its here now! BTW I'm sending this, both in a way similar to
> > what Daniel described (I hope :-), and also as a prequel to Illyana's
> > response. While this will bifurcate (word of the day!) the discussion,
> > it should do so in a linear fashion, allowing us to continue the two
> > conversations independent of one another.
>
> Yeah, I wasn't as clear as I wanted - using the Dankel-method (yeah, I'm
> that conceited ;) ), you would have taken Illyana's last reply and put
your
> stuff in the appropriate place instead of using T'sunami's, or at the
> instead pasted Illyana's reply below what you did in yours (since
> chronologicaly it would appear you spoke before her). I did something
> similar in my IC post sent with this one, if an example's needed. :)
>
> Splitting the converstaion into two simultaeous threads is just IMO what
> shouldn't be done, but that's just my opinion. Though if it works for
> everyone else, then that's fine by me.
>
> > What I've done, though, is
> > change the subject line. In other lists, I find changing the subject
> > very helpful, to allow the eye to quickly see ongoing "conversations",
> > so I'd propose doing that as well in future, That way, it helps delimit
> > the mails as to what conversation is in what - the only thing we have
> > to do then is keep them relevent, and a good way of doing this is
> > starting a new thread, or conversation, when you want to discuss, or
> > split up the topic.
>
> Actually Doug specifically requested we not change subjects so he can
sort
> mail by subject and have it chronological and what-not. Or, I assume, at
> least keep the chapter designation up there. Not sure about that last
part,
> though - I figure Doug will correct me when he gets back. :)
>
>
> -> Mailing List Archive - http://www.kript.net/parlainth/
> -> To unsubscribe: send a mail to majordomo_at_teaparty.net
> with the body text "unsubscribe parlainth"
> -> To see who's on the list: send a mail to majordomo_at_teaparty.net
> with the body text "who parlainth"
-> Mailing List Archive - http://www.kript.net/parlainth/
-> To unsubscribe: send a mail to majordomo_at_teaparty.net
with the body text "unsubscribe parlainth"
-> To see who's on the list: send a mail to majordomo_at_teaparty.net
with the body text "who parlainth"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Mon Jan 19 2004 - 06:01:48 GMT